That's not a moon! It's a trap! Admiral Akbar aside, I think it's some sort of lens flare.
On an APS you'd need to shoot at about 500mm to get the moon that size, larger on FF. The exif says about 50mm, so unless you cropped it way down, that wouldn't be the moon.
On 2025-10-16 11:30, ann sanfedele wrote:
what do you guys think about this ? I took it a little after 8 am in Toronto on October 16th, 2010.. according to lunar calendar it can't be an actual full moon.. and it would be setting not rising but I thought I was facing east... what camera problem or lighting in the sky could have created it? could there have been so much pollution that it is the sun? I'm totally flummoxed.. shot with my Canon eos Digtal Rebel.. details next to the photo if you click on the "i' . https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/Day-by-Day-Photo-Project-Page-2/i-XHmg9vB/A Ideas? It got be crazy because of a non -photographers love of the shot who thinks a got a perfect take of an etherial moon which made me look up the lunar calendar. ann -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks
-- Larry Colen [email protected] http://red4est.com/lrc -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
